Investment Summary
Spruce has multiple data readouts in various CAH segments in 2024, and presents a high risk opportunity. While past results suggest trial readouts will be positive, the relative magnitude of biomarker reductions will be critical, particularly as crinecerfont has set the bar at ~45%-55% reductions.
Pros:
MOA validated via early Spruce data and Neurocrine’s crinecerfont.
CAHmelia-203 trial design recruits pts with high baseline A4 (more likely to show large reductions)
Separation of trials into glucocorticoid sparing, and A4 reduction in poorly controlled patients (improves odds of success)
Cons:
Potential for drug-drug interactions with tildacerfont
Endpoint variability, and multiple biomarkers that don’t always correlate
COM patent expiry in 2027
Orphan designation potentially under threat from crinecerfont
Small sample size of ongoing trial (~20 per arm assumed)
Some doses tested may be too low (e.g 50mg)
Oddly presented data from initial studies (error bars)
Overall, this is a classic high risk, but potentially high reward situation. Positive results in March could send the stock up 50%+, but bad results could lead to drastic downside. A later readout in Q3 for glucocorticoid sparing could provide some downside protection, but Spruce will also have to do a near term raise so any dilution should be factored in.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Ninja Reports to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.